Saturday, December 6, 2008
Let's see how they ranked North Dakota. Pretty bad. North Dakota is ranked 44th out of 50 states and gets 4 out of a possible 100 points because rifles, shotguns and handguns are so easy to obtain and use there. A perfect score of 100 represents North Korea.
North Dakota must be a gun killer's paradise. Let's check US Crime Statistics. North Dakota has a murder and nonnegligent manslaughter rate of 1.9 per 100,000.
The Canadian province of Manitoba is just north of North Dakota. Everybody knows that Canada is a sheer paradise and does not allow common folk to have handguns. This must totally eliminate crime, especially murder, right? Let's check Canadian Crime Statististics [click here]. According to the official Canadian government statistics, Manitoba had a murder rate of 5.2 per 100,000.
Even worse, the new Canadian Inuit [f.k.a. "Eskimos"] territory of Nunavut has a murder rate of 22.5 per 100,000 [click here]
How can that be? Could the Brady Bunch be WRONG about guns??
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
"Bloomberg has made his war on illegal guns a signature issue. He also had harsh words for the hospital where Burress was treated, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center. He said hospital management should be charged for failing to report the incident, and that the hospital workers involved should be fired.
"'It is just an outrage that the hospital didn't do what they are legally required to do,' he said. 'It's a lame excuse that they didn't know – this is a world-class hospital in a city where we all know what goes on in the streets of our city, and we all should be working together to get guns off the streets.'
Unfortunately for Plaxico, this sounds like the perfect storm of people who, on general principles, would want his hide: racist red-staters and the fascist church ladies of the left.
[UPDATE] Reason has an excellent article here on Plaxico:
But Burress' teammate Steve Smith also lives in the public domain. Several days before the mishap at the club, Smith was robbed at gunpoint outside of his home in Clifton, New Jersey. Former Giants teammate and current NBC commentator Tiki Barber discussed the two crimes on Sunday Night Football, explaining that Burress' foolish act may have been rational, if not completely appropriate, given the dangers that NFL players such as Smith have faced.Looking back at recent gun-related tragedies that have struck the NFL, Barber continued, "We all remember [slain Denver Broncos cornerback] Derrent Willams from a couple of years ago and even last year, and ironically [Washington Redskins safety] Sean Taylor was honored at this game, and he was [fatally] attacked at his home. A lot of people believe that if [Taylor] had a gun, he wouldn't be dead right now." Barber failed to mention an attack earlier this year which left Jacksonville Jaguars offensive tackle Richard Collier paraplegic and without his left leg due to amputation..
Such an oversight is understandable given the surprisingly high number of similar incidents, but even those numbers are not enough to convince longtime NBC Sports broadcaster Bob Costas that protecting oneself with a handgun may be a rational decision. After Barber finished recalling the recently murdered NFL players, Costas launched into a harangue against the ludicrous notion of self-defense, demanding that Tiki provide a singular instance where a player had saved his own life or averted disaster with a handgun. While Barber agreed with Costas that Burress' actions were
irresponsible, he insisted that guns are common to many players, given the violent circumstances he described and the violent neighborhoods many of the NFL's athletes grew up in. They really do rely on guns for self-defense, Barber argued. And it doesn't take any great leap of logic to understand why these athletes don't broadcast the fact.
Such an admission in Washington, D.C., San Francisco, or Chicago—all cities with NFL franchises—could land a player in jail, in addition to the fines and suspensions handed down by the league (not to mention local politicians publicly chiding them as if they were irresponsible children). Leaving aside the wisdom of Burress's actions, the criminal penalty he faces, if convicted, is inflexible and unfair. No judge in the state of New York, no matter what evidence is given, no matter how sympathetic the judge may be to a man whose teammate had a gun pointed at his head less than a week before, no matter what damage lengthy incarceration may do to the man's career, family, and reputation, will be able to lessen the sentence accompanying a guilty verdict.
Tiki should have slapped that that little weenie Costas in the face.
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Discussing the future of freedom in 1989:
Charles Van Eaton
I have the entire 2 hour panel discussion and Murray's great dinner speech. These will be posted in the future.
However, nothing ever changes. Between April and September 2008, the Detroit News lost 10% and the Free Press 6% of its readership. That is simply amazing.
The tragedy of all this is that most people do not have the time or inclination to hunt for the truth about current events and history and are merely going to soak up the usual lies and distortions of the MSM media.
Friday, November 7, 2008
Those spending the new money have neither created nor do they possess anything of value with which to trade. In spending the new money, the holders of the new money are able to siphon away through purchase the valuable goods and services which could only be obtained by those holding the old money absent the fraudulent creation of the new diluted money which artificially increases demand for EVERYTHING and raises prices. Further, this constant monetary dilution is the sole cause of inflation. Inflation is impossible when money is backed by gold and silver because money backed by precious metals cannot be created out of thin air. Money should be the primary store of value. Houses should not be the primary store of value.
The FED’s money dilution inevitably creates a game of financial musical chairs with everyone trying to find value in the face of constantly diluted dollars. More egregiously, it effectively destroys the normal price system which is how economic information is transmitted in the market. Finally, the FED”s monetary dilution causes the boom and bust cycle by drawing investment into types of production that are unsustainable absent continuing monetary dilution. Indeed, these unsustainable lines of production will eventually fail even with additional money dilution. This is the situation in which we find ourselves today. Indeed, as the entire planet suddenly discovers that everyone is much poorer than previously realized, what the hell good will be an "injection" of diluted dollars into "the economy"? [HELLO MICHIGAN!!! AUTO FACTORIES AND AUTO PURCHASES ARE IMPACTED BY MONEY DILUTION TOO!! LONG TERM ECONOMIC PLANNING BECOMES IMPOSSIBLE!]
As such, in a regime with constantly diluted dollars, most capital gains are illusory, but are nevertheless taxable because there is no indexing of capital gains for inflation. THIS ISN'T THAT COMPLICATED. However, it appears to me that most people would rather live in a cold, muddy refugee camp in a cardboard box than spend the 8 minutes it might take to understand what the FED is doing to their lives.
Monday, May 26, 2008
I suppose that this is not surprising. The government then gets to bully us both ways.